看來哪天鑑定詢問時可以假託說神明下旨，說不定法官也會採信。作者: gbos12 時間: 2020-6-22 12:17 AM
判無期喔
過沒幾年說不定就能表現良好減刑、假釋等條款出來
殺血親可教化的理由是托夢
以後法律系要不要學跳大神、觀落陰？作者: ishuka2 時間: 2020-6-22 12:56 AM
現在連判死刑都不敢 台灣怎會有救!?
連這種無法求證的迷信也可以當作教化理由
幹X涼...現在法官都沒有魄力嗎???
書讀哪去了???作者: EndlessAngel 時間: 2020-6-22 06:27 AM
本帖最後由 EndlessAngel 於 2020-6-24 11:34 AM 編輯
Umm.....Hmm.....I wonder.......when the judges say "有教化可能"
"reformed", "rehabilitated.....how were they looking at it ? How was it determined ? What are the standards ? It's easy for the judges to make the ruling with the bang of the gavel saying "Oh.....you've been reformed and rehabilitated and ready to be re-introduced into the society." How are they going to ensure that ? Are the judges going to do it personally ? I'm not saying that those that have committed crimes don't deserve a second chance. However, it certainly has to depend on the nature of the crime. It isn't a simple "Oh...yes.....he or she felt remorseful. Therefore, he or she can be reformed and rehabilitated." You know.....I'm not saying all are like that.....but you got to question....how many of them feel remorseful and regret their actions because they truly do and not because of the fear of the consequences that they're about to face whether it's prison for life or the death penalty ? If, unfortunately, the outcome of that ruling did not have the effect that we all hoped for and he or she commits another crime and hurts other innocent people....what then ? Also, what about the victim's family and friends ? How are you ever going to justify any of this to them ? There's a lot to be considered.作者: 7-moon 時間: 2020-6-22 10:47 AM
我得更正我之前的說法:
我之前說，在台灣殺1-2個人不會被判死刑啦
我錯了。
殺了三個應該都還在扣達範圍。作者: scholar1870 時間: 2020-6-22 11:26 AM
